Why You Should Know About Dual Agency in Connecticut
October 24, 2006
Dual agency exists when a brokerage firm represents both the seller and buyer in the same transaction – the purchase and sale of one property, for example. Dual agency is akin to one law firm representing both sides in a court case but having two different attorneys handle opposing sides. Doesn’t make a whole lot of sense, does it? But dual agency is permitted under real estate law in CT and is commonplace. Here’s what you should know if you’re buying or selling a house in Connecticut and how dual agency affects you.
Dual agency in practice. I bought my first house using a traditional real estate agent. The agent showed my husband and me a house that was listed by another agent in her office. We put an offer on the property, it was accepted and we closed on the house.
It was years ago but I don’t recall signing a form or having dual agency explained to me. I did feel that the agent we worked with was not very helpful to us as buyers; but, I didn’t know enough about real estate or buying real estate to put my finger on it. It wasn’t until I worked with an exclusive buyer’s agent in the purchase of my next house that I realized what it was. My first real estate agent wasn’t helpful because she really didn’t work for me.
A Dual Agent Represents No One. When I signed a buyer agency agreement, a clause in that contract essentially reserved the agent the right to give me proper disclosures when and if a dual agency situation were to exist. According to real estate law in Connecticut, a real estate agent does not have to give you that disclosure until a dual agency situation exists. Dual agency only exists when you’ve signed a contract with a brokerage firm and its agent to represent you as a buyer and you locate a house that is the broker’s listing (the agent works for the broker and all listings belong to the broker). You’re about to put in an offer and that’s when you find out – the brokerage represents the seller and therefore you must sign an “agreement” that you understand the broker can’t do certain things for you any more, a Dual Agency Consent Agreement.
Here’s why this is a problem for buyers and sellers. You’ve signed a contract with a broker and its agent to represent you. As their client, you are owed certain “fiduciary responsibilities,” namely Obedience, Undivided Loyalty, Full Disclosure, Confidentiality, Accounting and Reasonable Care and Diligence. When represented by the same broker, neither the buyer nor seller can be guaranteed Obedience, Loyalty, Disclosure or Confidentiality. Therefore, the Dual Agency Consent Agreement has both parties agree to be essentially unrepresented because the broker cannot fulfill all of their fiduciary responsibilities to both parties.
Using my home purchase as an example, my agent would not have been able to tell me, for instance, that the seller might be willing to take less than asking price. Ignoring the fact that she might have overheard this information from the listing agent in her office, she would be hurting the position of the seller who is a client of the brokerage firm they both work for. Neither agent can disclose the motivation of their party – e.g. divorce, new job, pending purchase or sale of another property, that would give an advantage to one side.
We would have paid more for the house but our agent couldn’t tell that to the seller! At the time, I thought we really made out in the deal. But when we went to sell the house two years later, the woman who bought it had a hawk for a real estate agent and we got nailed for inspection items that either the inspector our agent recommended didn’t pick up on or items she dissuaded us from asking the seller to handle.
So, the Dual Agency Consent basically says to buyers and sellers, “We’ll help you fill out the paperwork, but don’t ask any questions.” How’s that for representation?
Not on the Market Yet Listings. I actually have one thing to say about dual agency that’s positive for a buyer. If you’re a buyer in a strong seller’s market and you know exactly where you want to live (the exact town and area) and know a lot about the area, then signing on with a leading listing agent and broker in the area may actually be to your advantage.
When properties are flying off the market, an agent with a firm that has a majority of the listings in the area you want to buy in, will have access to exclusive listings and pre-market listings, the listings that haven’t been added to the MLS yet. Not only may you find out a house before competition, your agent may take a cut on the commission overall, saving you and the seller some money. The agent may not neccessarily hand those savings over to you but you should certainly expect it in return for not really working for you!
Entry Filed under: Buying a House, Real Estate, Selling a House. .
5 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed



1. Athol Kay | November 1, 2006 at 1:41 am
It’s actually against the rules of the Co-op MLS that covers the majority of the state to hold back “pre-listings”. Once someone is signed as a client you have 24 hours to get the listing posted on the MLS or face fines. Nor does a “pre-listing” sale benefit the seller, the extra exposure of the MLS may have drawn in additional buying interest that would increase the final price of the home.
Whats your take on dual designated agency?
2. berealct | November 1, 2006 at 1:40 pm
Athol:
Thanks for the comment. You’re right. It is against MLS rules to do so. However, since real estate agents police themselves, it’s like having the wolf guard the chicken coop (is that the correct analogy??). Most agents don’t do it but I can tell you from lots of personal experience, it does happen.
There are agents who’ll put a property on the market in Temp status, particularly in a hot market. And, what do you know? Two or three days later, the property becomes active and hours later, it’s under contract. How does that happen if the property is temporarily off the market?
I’ve had agents refuse to allow me to show their listings. The property is active but when I call the agent to show it, the agent won’t call back (even after 5 or 6 calls) or calls me to tell me it’s under deposit. I look in the MLS and it isn’t – even days later.
I could go on and on….Glad you asked about designated dual agency. I’ll make that my next post!
3. Designated Agency in Connecticut - Still Dual Agency « Real Real Estate in Connecticut | November 2, 2006 at 2:02 pm
[...] In a previous post, Why You Should Know About Dual Agency in Connecticut, I defined dual agency for you and why you should know about it if you are going to sell a house or buy a house in Connecticut. You should also understand “Designated Agency,” which is still dual agency, only more confusing. Dual agency exists when a brokerage firm represents both the seller and buyer in the same transaction – the purchase and sale of one property, for example. Dual agency is akin to one law firm representing both sides in a court case but having two different attorneys handle opposing sides. Doesn’t make a whole lot of sense, does it? [...]
4. Athol Kay | November 2, 2006 at 7:31 pm
Sounds like you’ve had some rough experiences
Can always call the seller and ask why their agent is refusing to allow you to see the property I suppose if the selling agent is playing hardball. Well maybe contacting GHAR or CAR would be more polite.
5. Designated Agency in Connecticut - Still Dual Agency | April 7, 2008 at 3:50 pm
[...] a previous post, Why You Should Know About Dual Agency in Connecticut, I defined dual agency for you and why you should know about it if you are going to sell a house or [...]